Context |
This cannot be a realistic option. Moreover, from the results of studies reviewed here, we also know that this is unnecessary. We have seen that where there are good psycholinguistic reasons for generalisation to spontaneous speech to take place, and when these are made explicit and incorporated within therapy, and then such generalisation can take place. If the therapy is aiming to change the processing underlying the language, then effects of the therapy beyond the treated items can be anticipated. A psycholinguistic rationale, however, is not sufficient on its own to bring about a more extensive change.
|